Re: [PATCH] PowerPC address support clean, patch 3 of 4

[Michael Meissner <meissner at linux dot ibm dot com>]

These patches were previously posted in March as a RFC, and I would like to
check them into the trunk.  These patches make the mode_supports* functions use
similar names for the functions that return if a mode supports D-FORM, DS-FORM,
and/or DQ-FORM instructions, and add the ability to ask whether a particular
reload register class supports a particular D*-form instruction.

This is patch #3 of 4.

I have done a bootstrap with patches 1-4 and did a make check comparison on a
little endian power8 system, and there were no regressions.  Can I check it in?

2018-05-03  Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

	* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (mode_supports_d_form): Rename
	mode_supports_vmx_dform to mode_supports_d_form.  Add an optional
	argument to say which reload register class to use.  Change all
	callers to pass in the RELOAD_REG_VMX class explicitly.
	(rs6000_secondary_reload): Likewise.
	(rs6000_preferred_reload_class): Likewise.
	(rs6000_secondary_reload_class): Likewise.

-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA
email: meissner@linux.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797

Attachment: ext-addr.rev3-patch03b
Description: Text document