This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR83969: ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997
- From: Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Arseny Solokha <asolokha at gmx dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:44:36 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR83969: ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997
- References: <a90d0b0e-c605-747e-1a47-572a59fb2977@vnet.ibm.com> <20180309193107.GX21977@gate.crashing.org> <df219d77-c63c-08ec-dbce-0d5d1944d78c@vnet.ibm.com> <9b44e339-ffa2-dc9d-c512-631f0b6c6a83@vnet.ibm.com> <20180419224035.GH23207@gate.crashing.org> <d2398f8d-9815-31b4-8986-c3a276dd5649@vnet.ibm.com>
On 4/20/18 9:34 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Neither test case fails on GCC 6, but I haven't tested on BE which is
> where the PR83969 test case was failing (-m32 BE). I'll do a build on
> BE and verify whether the tests compile there or not. If they PASS,
> I'd probably just leave it alone until someone comes up with a test
> case that FAILs on GCC 6 before back porting it.
OK, GCC 6 on BE doesn't ICE on either test case, so I'm going to just
leave things as they are there. We can always back port the fixes later
if someone comes up with yet another test case that fails there.
Peter