This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] S/390: Set ABI default based on uname

From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
To: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:53:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] S/390: Set ABI default based on uname
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20180312172809.10870-1-krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180312173134.GO8577@tucnak> <782d51e6-1525-218a-6ca6-ec2944537116@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180312175057.GP8577@tucnak> <f1c40f0a-8799-f89c-e28a-8fc133ca9d4c@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi,

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Andreas Krebbel wrote:

> Leaving history aside don't you agree that it would have been more 
> sensible to require a -m option only if you want to build for an ABI 
> different from what is currently mandated by the personality setting?

I agree with you.  But we can't leave history aside, so I'm having the 
same sentiment as Jakub.  The current situation is not good, but changing 
behaviour would be even worse.

Ciao,
Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] S/390: Set ABI default based on uname
  - From: Andreas Krebbel

References:
- [PATCH] S/390: Set ABI default based on uname
  - From: Andreas Krebbel
- Re: [PATCH] S/390: Set ABI default based on uname
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] S/390: Set ABI default based on uname
  - From: Andreas Krebbel
- Re: [PATCH] S/390: Set ABI default based on uname
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] S/390: Set ABI default based on uname
  - From: Andreas Krebbel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]