This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 02/27/2018 03:29 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/27/2018 01:51 PM, Håkon Sandsmark wrote:Thanks for the feedback. I chose to take the example from the bug report verbatim as the test case. However, I agree it makes sense to have the simplest possible test case that reproduces the issue. Here is an updated patch.Thanks!+ /* If there is any qualification still in effect, clear it + * now; we will be starting fresh with the next capture. */For future reference, we don't add * at the beginning of subsequent lines in a comment. I'll correct that in this patch and check it in.
Done. FYI I also renamed the testcase to lambda-init17.C; I sometimes like to run e.g. the *lambda* tests as a smoke test, and "pr12345" isn't very useful for that.
Jason
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |