This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add "native" as a valid option value for -march= on i386 (PR driver/83193).


On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:58:07PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> writes:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Following patch adds "native" as a possible option for -march value on
> > i386 target.  I have similar patches for other targets. Would it be
> > possible to install the patch in current stage?
> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> > index d54e7301e84..361d4df2663 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> > @@ -4193,6 +4193,9 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
> >  		|| ((processor_alias_table[i].flags & PTA_64BIT) != 0)))
> >  	  candidates.safe_push (processor_alias_table[i].name);
> >  
> > +      /* Add also "native" as possible value.  */
> > +      candidates.safe_push ("native");
> > +
> >        char *s;
> >        const char *hint
> >  	= candidates_list_and_hint (opts->x_ix86_arch_string, s, candidates);
> 
> We should probably only do this if the driver supports -march=native.
> I think for x86 that means HAVE_LOCAL_CPU_DETECT.

Isn't the option available always?  It just doesn't do anything if
/* If we are compiling with GCC where %EBX register is fixed, then the
   driver will just ignore -march and -mtune "native" target and will leave
   to the newly built compiler to generate code for its default target.  */

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]