This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumber being NULL in arm.h



On 20/12/17 09:22, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:

On 19/12/17 21:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:58:37PM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> 2017-12-19  Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>
>>      PR target/82975
>>      * gcc.dg/pr82975.c: New test.
> The testcase FAILs on x86_64-linux/i686-linux and probably on all
> non-arm/aarch64 targets.
>
> Fixed thusly, committed to trunk as obvious.

Thank you for fixing this. I had committed an older version of the
testcase accidentally :(
My proper testcase did have the target guard.


In fact, here is the patch I meant to commit.
Committed the missing comment change to arm.h.

Kyrill

Kyrill

> 2017-12-19  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>        PR target/82975
>        * gcc.dg/pr82975.c: Only add -mtune=cortex-a57 on arm*/aarch64*
>        targets.
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr82975.c.jj 2017-12-19 18:07:33.000000000 +0100 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr82975.c 2017-12-19 22:53:36.383901451 +0100
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>   /* PR target/82975.  */
>   /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-mtune=cortex-a57 -fno-sched-pressure -O2" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-fno-sched-pressure -O2" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-mtune=cortex-a57" { target arm*-*-* aarch64*-*-* } } */
>
>   typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
>
>
>        Jakub


commit d0469b43a85de253444f36702090219521e65f54
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 18 12:06:55 2017 +0000

    [arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumber being NULL in arm.h

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
index ac51412..c46fd60 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
@@ -1615,12 +1615,10 @@ enum arm_auto_incmodes
 
 /* These assume that REGNO is a hard or pseudo reg number.
    They give nonzero only if REGNO is a hard reg of the suitable class
-   or a pseudo reg currently allocated to a suitable hard reg.
-   Since they use reg_renumber, they are safe only once reg_renumber
-   has been allocated, which happens in reginfo.c during register
-   allocation.  */
+   or a pseudo reg currently allocated to a suitable hard reg.  */
 #define TEST_REGNO(R, TEST, VALUE) \
-  ((R TEST VALUE) || ((unsigned) reg_renumber[R] TEST VALUE))
+  ((R TEST VALUE)	\
+    || (reg_renumber && ((unsigned) reg_renumber[R] TEST VALUE)))
 
 /* Don't allow the pc to be used.  */
 #define ARM_REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P(REGNO)			\
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr82975.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr82975.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f4c15fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr82975.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* PR target/82975.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fno-sched-pressure -O2" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mtune=cortex-a57 -fno-sched-pressure -O2" { target arm*-*-* } } */
+
+typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
+
+struct S1
+{
+  char pad1;
+  char val;
+  short pad2;
+};
+
+extern char t[256];
+
+void foo (struct S1 a, size_t i)
+{
+  t[i] = a.val;
+}

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]