This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix up one mishandled plural in diagnostics in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c


On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 07:02:38PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On December 19, 2017 6:58:15 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:49:07AM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> Can the math be moved into inform_n (and warning_n) itself?
> >
> >No.  I'm against having dozens of inform_n and warning_n etc.
> >overloads, it is already bad enough we have so many diagnostics
> >entry points now that putting breakpoints on them is so hard.
> >Those functions just have int, and we can have
> >perhaps some other function (plural_count or some better name)
> >that is inline and overloaded on the various types and can be used
> >if the count isn't int.
> >
> >As for gimple-ssa-sprintf.c, there are several other cases that
> >want a plural form, but I haven't changed them because
> >format_warning_at_substring doesn't have _n suffixed variant.
> 
> Can't we simply use bytes (plural) and not care for the detail of special
> values like one?  Other languages (Czech?) even have special cases for two
> and three...

If it is supposed to be gramattically correct, it should use the _n suffixed
APIs.  There are languages with just 1 or 2, 3, 4 and 6 forms, see
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/gettext/manual/html_node/Plural-forms.html
for details.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]