This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Document the medlow and medany code models

From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
To: Andrew Waterman <andrew at sifive dot com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <patches at groups dot riscv dot org>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 00:09:06 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Document the medlow and medany code models
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20171101005406.18684-1-palmer@dabbelt.com> <59F943DB.4040809@codesourcery.com> <CA++6G0A-4PAp58uVKYn6aVGDCdM5SeSaZHU4z8PhD2HAkDNXyA@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/31/2017 10:27 PM, Andrew Waterman wrote:

I have to disagree.  It's standard to not hyphenate an
adverb-adjective compound, since they tend not to be ambiguous.  But
if the standard in the GCC documentation is to hyphenate, I will not
stand in the way!

Heh, you got me on this one -- it's one of those weird special cases,the "adverb ending in -ly plus participle" case listed here:


http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/images/ch07_tab01.pdf

So the patch is OK as-is, but maybe I need a few new brain cells.  :-P

-Sandra

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Document the medlow and medany code models
  - From: Andrew Waterman

References:
- [PATCH] RISC-V: Document the medlow and medany code models
  - From: Palmer Dabbelt
- Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Document the medlow and medany code models
  - From: Sandra Loosemore
- Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Document the medlow and medany code models
  - From: Andrew Waterman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]