This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Enable no-exec stacks for more targets using the Linux kernel


On Sep 19 2017, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> I've sent a glibc patch 
> <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-09/msg00734.html>.  I think the 
> key questions for architecture experts now are: on each of those three 
> architectures, do trampolines ever require executable stacks, and, if they 
> do, how does this work at present when the kernel defaults to 
> non-executable and my understanding at 
> <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-09/msg00747.html> would be that 
> glibc would only make thread stacks executable on those architectures, not 
> the main process stacks, and GCC will never generate an explicit marker on 
> those architectures to request an executable stack?

For ia64 on linux there is EF_IA_64_LINUX_EXECUTABLE_STACK to request
executable heap and stack.  But since ia64 uses function descriptors,
trampolines never need that.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]