This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 0006-Part-6.-Add-x86-tests-for-Intel-CET-implementation
- From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: "Tsimbalist, Igor V" <igor dot v dot tsimbalist at intel dot com>, "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:03:05 -0600
- Subject: Re: 0006-Part-6.-Add-x86-tests-for-Intel-CET-implementation
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=law at redhat dot com
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com CF7C513A49
- References: <D511F25789BA7F4EBA64C8A63891A0027AA040A4@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 08/01/2017 02:56 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote:
> Part#6. Add x86 tests for Intel CET implementation.
>
>
> 0006-Part-6.-Add-x86-tests-for-Intel-CET-implementation.patch
>
>
> From e4a8227e83e8e9f3ddbaa97707f3d335009e0e77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Igor Tsimbalist <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 19:40:40 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 6/9] Part#6. Add x86 tests for Intel CET implementation.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> * g++.dg/cet-notrack-1.C: New test.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-1.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-10.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-2.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-3.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-4.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-5.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-6.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-7.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-8.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-9.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-label.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-1a.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-1b.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-2a.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-2b.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-3.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-4a.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-4b.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-5a.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-5b.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-6a.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-6b.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-7.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-property-1.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-property-2.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-rdssp-1.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-1.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-2.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-3.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-switch-1.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/cet-switch-2.c: Likewise.
> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_cet): New
> proc.
Whoops. NEvermind my previous comment about x86 specific tests. I
should have scanned the whole kit before starting to comment on the
earlier patches.
Uros will have the say on the x86 specific bits. Given it's been 3
weeks, you might want to ping him directly to start getting his feedback.
jeff