This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH, gcc-7-branch] Backport PR80038
- From: Xi Ruoyao <ryxi at stu dot xidian dot edu dot cn>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- Cc: ryxi at stu dot xidian dot edu dot cn, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:37:23 +0800
- Subject: [PATCH, gcc-7-branch] Backport PR80038
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1490968216.19897.36.camel@stu.xidian.edu.cn> <92541d5b-cf85-94de-4a81-29cb2a757ade@redhat.com> <1491573766.1782.7.camel@stu.xidian.edu.cn> <f2f74bb5-7f36-6306-8b81-de7d87a46a14@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc0TPi_gEA0f8zJU5oUEBPhoTMXUwU9ysG1NeH5+qmKZGg@mail.gmail.com> <1492153217.3945.9.camel@stu.xidian.edu.cn> <1492217060.991.1.camel@stu.xidian.edu.cn> <60054e41-6470-40c7-ed8b-7b05862f5969@redhat.com>
On 2017-04-25 09:30 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/14/2017 06:44 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > On 2017-04-14 15:00 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > On 2017-04-13 09:05 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > > Did you verify LTO bootstrap still works with the patch?
> > >
> > > I've just done a LTO bootstrapp (boarding a train :) ).
> > > It works with my patch.
> >
> > I've done dejagnu tests in lto.exp and built a Linux kernel
> > with lto bootstrapped GCC. They seem good.
>
> Given Richi's general agreement around the in_lto_p, let's go with the
> patch on the trunk only.
>
> If you get positive feedback from Jan, then this can be backported to
> gcc-7 after it's been on the trunk for at least a week.
We have 15 weeks now :)
Re-tested on gcc-7-branch with lto-bootstrap. No regressions. Is it
OK to backport this to gcc-7-branch?
--
Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University