Re: [06/77] Make GET_MODE_WIDER return an opt_mode

[Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>]

On 07/13/2017 02:40 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> GET_MODE_WIDER previously returned VOIDmode if no wider mode existed.
> That would cause problems with stricter mode classes, since VOIDmode
> isn't for example a valid scalar integer or floating-point mode.
> This patch instead makes it return a new opt_mode<T> class, which
> holds either a T or nothing.
> 
> 2017-07-13  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
> 	    Alan Hayward  <alan.hayward@arm.com>
> 	    David Sherwood  <david.sherwood@arm.com>
> 
> gcc/
> 	* coretypes.h (opt_mode): New class.
> 	* machmode.h (opt_mode): Likewise.
> 	(opt_mode::else_void): New function.
> 	(opt_mode::operator *): Likewise.
> 	(opt_mode::exists): Likewise.
> 	(GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE): Turn into a function and return an opt_mode.
> 	(GET_MODE_2XWIDER_MODE): Likewise.
> 	(mode_iterator::get_wider): Update accordingly.
> 	(mode_iterator::get_2xwider): Likewise.
> 	(mode_iterator::get_known_wider): Likewise, turning into a template.
> 	* combine.c (make_extraction): Update use of GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE,
> 	forcing a wider mode to exist.
> 	* config/cr16/cr16.h (LONG_REG_P): Likewise.
> 	* rtlanal.c (init_num_sign_bit_copies_in_rep): Likewise.
> 	* config/c6x/c6x.c (c6x_rtx_costs): Update use of
> 	GET_MODE_2XWIDER_MODE, forcing a wider mode to exist.
> 	* lower-subreg.c (init_lower_subreg): Likewise.
> 	* optabs-libfuncs.c (init_sync_libfuncs_1): Likewise, but not
> 	on the final iteration.
> 	* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_set_or_movmem): Check whether
> 	a wider mode exists before asking for a move pattern.
> 	(get_mode_wider_vector): Update use of GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE,
> 	forcing a wider mode to exist.
> 	(expand_vselect_vconcat): Update use of GET_MODE_2XWIDER_MODE,
> 	returning false if no such mode exists.
> 	* config/ia64/ia64.c (expand_vselect_vconcat): Likewise.
> 	* config/mips/mips.c (mips_expand_vselect_vconcat): Likewise.
> 	* expmed.c (init_expmed_one_mode): Update use of GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE.
> 	Avoid checking for a MODE_INT if we already know the mode is not a
> 	SCALAR_INT_MODE_P.
> 	(extract_high_half): Update use of GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE,
> 	forcing a wider mode to exist.
> 	(expmed_mult_highpart_optab): Likewise.
> 	(expmed_mult_highpart): Likewise.
> 	* expr.c (expand_expr_real_2): Update use of GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE,
> 	using else_void.
> 	* lto-streamer-in.c (lto_input_mode_table): Likewise.
> 	* optabs-query.c (find_widening_optab_handler_and_mode): Likewise.
> 	* stor-layout.c (bit_field_mode_iterator::next_mode): Likewise.
> 	* internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): Update use of
> 	GET_MODE_2XWIDER_MODE.
> 	* omp-low.c (omp_clause_aligned_alignment): Likewise.
> 	* tree-ssa-math-opts.c (convert_mult_to_widen): Update use of
> 	GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE.
> 	(convert_plusminus_to_widen): Likewise.
> 	* tree-switch-conversion.c (array_value_type): Likewise.
> 	* var-tracking.c (emit_note_insn_var_location): Likewise.
> 	* tree-vrp.c (simplify_float_conversion_using_ranges): Likewise.
> 	Return false inside rather than outside the loop if no wider mode
> 	exists
> 	* optabs.c (expand_binop): Update use of GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE
> 	and GET_MODE_2XWIDER_MODE
> 	(can_compare_p): Use else_void.
> 	* gdbhooks.py (OptMachineModePrinter): New class.
> 	(build_pretty_printer): Use it for opt_mode.
> 
> gcc/ada/
> 	* gcc-interface/decl.c (validate_size): Update use of
> 	GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE, forcing a wider mode to exist.
I'm not a big fan of the API here, particularly using operator* to
handle asserting the mode exists.  I'd prefer to just use a member
function rather than overloading operator*.

What's the rationale behind using operator* to imply the assertion?

THe changes themsleves look fine, it's really just a question of the API
we present.

jeff