This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] match.pd: reassociate multiplications with constants
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > > +/* Combine successive multiplications. Similar to above, but handling
> > > + overflow is different. */
> > > +(simplify
> > > + (mult (mult @0 INTEGER_CST@1) INTEGER_CST@2)
> > > + (with {
> > > + bool overflow_p;
> > > + wide_int mul = wi::mul (@1, @2, TYPE_SIGN (type), &overflow_p);
> > > + }
> > > + (if (!overflow_p || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type))
> >
> > I wonder if there are cases where this would cause trouble for saturating
> > integers. The only case I can think of is when @2 is -1, but that's likely
> > simplified to NEGATE_EXPR first.
>
> Ah, yes, I think if @2 is -1 or 0 then we should not attempt this transform for
> either saturating or sanitized types, just like in the first patch. I think
> wrapping the 'with' with 'if (!integer_minus_onep (@2) && !integer_zerop (@2))'
> works, since as you say it should become a negate/zero anyway?
Updated patch:
* match.pd ((X * CST1) * CST2): Simplify to X * (CST1 * CST2).
testsuite:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/assoc-2.c: Enhance.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-4.c: Adjust.
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 36045f1..0bb5541 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -283,6 +283,20 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
|| mul != wi::min_value (TYPE_PRECISION (type), SIGNED))
{ build_zero_cst (type); })))))
+/* Combine successive multiplications. Similar to above, but handling
+ overflow is different. */
+(simplify
+ (mult (mult @0 INTEGER_CST@1) INTEGER_CST@2)
+ /* More specific rules can handle 0 and -1; skip them here to avoid
+ wrong transformations for sanitized and saturating types. */
+ (if (!integer_zerop (@2) && !integer_minus_onep (@2))
+ (with {
+ bool overflow_p;
+ wide_int mul = wi::mul (@1, @2, TYPE_SIGN (type), &overflow_p);
+ }
+ (if (!overflow_p || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type))
+ (mult @0 { wide_int_to_tree (type, mul); })))))
+
/* Optimize A / A to 1.0 if we don't care about
NaNs or Infinities. */
(simplify
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/assoc-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/assoc-2.c
index a92c882..cc0e9d4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/assoc-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/assoc-2.c
@@ -5,4 +5,15 @@ int f0(int a, int b){
return a * 33 * b * 55;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "mult_expr" 2 "gimple" } } */
+int f1(int a){
+ a *= 33;
+ return a * 55;
+}
+
+int f2(int a, int b){
+ a *= 33;
+ return a * b * 55;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "mult_expr" 7 "gimple" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "mult_expr" 5 "optimized" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-4.c
index 17d7b4c..1e943b7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-4.c
@@ -23,13 +23,9 @@ f (int i)
foo (y);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\* 4" 1 "slsr" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\* 10" 1 "slsr" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\+ 20;" 1 "slsr" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\* 40" 1 "slsr" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\+ 200" 1 "slsr" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\- 16;" 1 "slsr" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\- 160" 1 "slsr" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\* 4" 1 "optimized" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\* 10" 1 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\* 40" 1 "optimized" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\+ 200" 1 "optimized" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\+ 40" 1 "optimized" } } */