This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: Consider Kaby Lake to be equivalent to Skylake
- From: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail dot com>
- To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, "H . J . Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:33:53 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: Consider Kaby Lake to be equivalent to Skylake
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20170616214249.21194-1-mattst88@gmail.com> <CAFULd4a_=rHQRb-BnxhArO+jUqQZ5rc5EBzteUQqdO4hcNA_GQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Currently -march=native selects -march=broadwell on Kaby Lake systems,
>> since its model numbers are missing from the switch statement. It falls
>> back to the default case and chooses -march=broadwell because of the
>> presence of the ADX instruction set.
>>
>> gcc/
>> * config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu): Add Kaby
>> Lake models to skylake case.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>>
>> * gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c: Add Kaby Lake models to
>> skylake check.
>>
>> libgcc/
>>
>> * config/i386/cpuinfo.c (get_intel_cpu): Add Kaby Lake models to
>> skylake case.
>
> OK.
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.
Thank you very much. I do not have write access, so please check the
patches in for me if you would not mind.