Re: [PING] [PATCH v4 0/12] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues

[Daniel Santos <daniel dot santos at pobox dot com>]

On 05/13/2017 11:52 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Ping?  I have posted revisions of the following in patch set:
> >
> > 05/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg01442.html
> > 09/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00348.html
> > 11/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00350.html
> >
> > I have retested them on Linux x86-64 in addition a Wine testsuite comparison
> > resulting in fewer failed tests (31) than when using unpatched 7.1.0 (78)
> > and 5.4.0 (78).  A cursory examination of the now working failures with
> > 7.1.0 seemed to be to be due to race conditions in Wine that are
> > incidentally hidden after the patches.
> >
> > Is there anything else needed before we can commit these?  They still rebase
> > cleanly onto the HEAD, but I can repost as "v5" if you prefer.
> Please go ahead and commit the patches.
>
> However, please stay around to fix possible fallout. As said - you are
> touching quite complex part of the compiler ...
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.

Thanks!  I'll definitely be around, I have a lot more that I'm working 
on with C generics/pseudo-templates (all middle-end stuff). I also want 
to examine more ways that SSE saves/restores can be omitted in these ms 
to sysv calls through static analysis and such.

Anyway, I don't yet have SVN write access, will you sponsor my request?

Thanks,
Daniel