This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] make RTL/TREE/IPA dump kind an index


On 12 May 2017 01:10:19 CEST, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 12 May 2017 00:57:58 CEST, Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
>wrote:
>>Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 11 May 2017 15:10:36 CEST, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
>>>>On 05/11/2017 08:28 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On the gcc-7 branch, the dump file (from -fdump-class-hierarchy)
>>was
>>>>> called covariant7.C.002t.class, now it's covariant7.C.002l.class. 
>>>>But
>>>>> gcc/testsuite/lib/scantree.exp (scan-tree-dump) expects the
>>>>NNNt.<dump>
>>>>> form.
>>>>
>>>>fixed thusly, applied as obvious.
>>>>
>>>>the scan$foo.exp files look like they could benefit from a
>>higher-level
>>>>
>>>>scandump.exp interface, but that's a cleanup for another day.
>>>
>>> Yea and once we can require a recent dejagnu (maybe for gcc-8
>>finally) we
>>> can apply the removal of the load_lib TCL hackery.


>>However, the introduction of scanlang.exp broke libatomic, libgomp,
>and
>>libitm testing.  Their logfiles show
>
>Indeed I remember. I don't remember offhand if the search_dirs fix up
>in dejagnu allowed to reduce this mess but I think it did.
>Oh well.

Specifically
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-03/msg00094.html

dejagnu-1.5.2 contains the libdirs tweak and was released 2015-01-30

Mike,  can we please bump the required dejagnu version for GCC-8?
Thanks 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]