This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Vect peeling cost model


On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Wrap some frequently used snippets in separate functions.

+/* Get the costs of peeling NPEEL iterations checking data access costs
+   for all data refs. */

-/* Traverse peeling hash table and calculate cost for each peeling option.
-   Find the one with the lowest cost.  */
-
-int
-vect_peeling_hash_get_lowest_cost (_vect_peel_info **slot,
-                                  _vect_peel_extended_info *min)
+static void
+vect_get_peeling_costs_all_drs (struct data_reference *dr0,
+                               unsigned int *inside_cost,
+                               unsigned int *outside_cost,
+                               stmt_vector_for_cost *body_cost_vec,
+                               unsigned int npeel, unsigned int vf)
 {
-  vect_peel_info elem = *slot;
-  int save_misalignment, dummy;
-  unsigned int inside_cost = 0, outside_cost = 0, i;
-  gimple *stmt = DR_STMT (elem->dr);
+  gimple *stmt = DR_STMT (dr0);
   stmt_vec_info stmt_info = vinfo_for_stmt (stmt);

ick.  Another case that shows why I like context diffs more ...

Patch looks ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2017-04-26  Robin Dapp  <rdapp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>         * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_update_misalignment_for_peel): Rename.
>         (vect_get_peeling_costs_all_drs): Create function.
>         (vect_peeling_hash_get_lowest_cost):
>         Use vect_get_peeling_costs_all_drs.
>         (vect_peeling_supportable): Create function.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]