This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 04/06/2017 09:16 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On April 6, 2017 8:12:29 PM GMT+02:00, Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> wrote:But isn't the effective type changed by the assignment b[1] = 0; as described in 6.5(6): "If a value is stored into an object having no declared type through an lvalue having a type that is not a character type, then the type of the lvalue becomes the effective type of the object for that access and for subsequent accesses that do not modify the stored value."Yes. I think the example is valid. At least GCCs memory model makes it so.
As far as I understand the standard, C does not permit changing the effective type of an object if it has a declared type (at least not without a union). If GCC supports it, that's an undocumented GCC extension.
Thanks, Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |