This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 03/04/17 20:06 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/04/17 11:48 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:[ dup, I sent the wrong from the wrong email address, you might not see it because of that ]On Apr 3, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Mike Stump <mrs@mrs.kithrup.com> wrote: On Apr 3, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:This fixes lots of typos throughout the tree. Can this be committed to trunk as obvious?Yes, it can. However, I like it when even this patch is reviewed. I reviewed it, looks good. You missed initialisers -> initializers.Ah yes, in a couple of places. I think the original email about these typos only covered words beginning with the letters A to E, so there are bound to be lots more typos unfixed :-)Not sure I like datastructures, should be data structures?Will do. I also forgot to do something about the "accestor ???" part We provide accestor to the inline_summary datastructure and basic logic updating the parameters when inlining is performed. I don't know what that's supposed to say. "access"? "accessors"?
I went for "access". Thanks for the review.
figure out that poth parameters -> figure out that both parametersI'll fix that.I've bootstrapped the C and C++ compilers, but not Ada, and of course not compiled all the target changes in gcc/config/* Is one big commit OK, or one per-ChangeLog? Or something else?I'd just do one big commit.Will do, thanks.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |