This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[doc] doc/invoke.texi: tweaks around link-time optimization
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 23:01:54 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: [doc] doc/invoke.texi: tweaks around link-time optimization
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
As an adjective, we spell link-time with a hypen.
And "link-time optimization at link time" felt a bit much. ;-)
Applied, and I did a grep in all of gcc/doc for further instances.
Gerald
2017-03-11 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
* doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Fix spelling of link-time
optimization.
(Optimize Options): Ditto. Also remove redundancy.
Index: doc/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/invoke.texi (revision 246070)
+++ doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -5134,7 +5134,7 @@
or, if possible, its type were
declared in an anonymous namespace or with the @code{final} specifier.
This warning is
-more effective with link time optimization, where the information about the
+more effective with link-time optimization, where the information about the
class hierarchy graph is more complete. It is recommended to first consider
suggestions of @option{-Wsuggest-final-types} and then rebuild with new
annotations.
@@ -8098,7 +8098,7 @@
Perform Identical Code Folding for functions and read-only variables.
The optimization reduces code size and may disturb unwind stacks by replacing
a function by equivalent one with a different name. The optimization works
-more effectively with link time optimization enabled.
+more effectively with link-time optimization enabled.
Nevertheless the behavior is similar to Gold Linker ICF optimization, GCC ICF
works on different levels and thus the optimizations are not same - there are
@@ -8827,7 +8827,7 @@
optimization though GCC tries to be clever at guessing an
optimization level to use from the options used at compile time
if you fail to specify one at link time. You can always override
-the automatic decision to do link-time optimization at link time
+the automatic decision to do link-time optimization
by passing @option{-fno-lto} to the link command.
To make whole program optimization effective, it is necessary to make