This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Uros Bizjak wrote: > >> > Annoying me for quite some time, fixed as follows. >> > >> > Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk. >> >> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl/x86_64/dfinit.c >> =================================================================== >> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl/x86_64/dfinit.c (revision 245830) >> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl/x86_64/dfinit.c (working copy) >> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >> -/* { dg-do run { target x86_64-*-* } } */ >> +/* { dg-do run { target { x86_64-*-* && lp64 } } } */ >> >> All hese should be "{ target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && { ! ia32 } } >> }". x32 works OK with all test, modulo final.c where it ICEs for some >> reason. > > AFAIK they were testcases with RTL generated for x86_64 lp64 so > restricting to that is appropriate IMHO (do we really support > -m64 on i?86-*-*?) > > But feel free to adjust them as you see fit - I was just annoyed > by the persisting FAILs. Adjusted by attached patch. 2017-03-02 Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> * gcc.dg/rtl/x86_64/*.c: Test for "{ i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && lp64" targets only. Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32} and committed to mainline SVN. Uros
Attachment:
t.diff.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |