This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wwwdocs] Add a case to porting_to + a question wrt validity of another one
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:14:14PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> I'm not suggesting to drop both. But:
>
> »As a consequence, the following examples are invalid and G++ will no
> longer compile them, because, in the following examples, G++ used to...«
>
> The second occurrence of "the following examples" doesn't add any new
> meaning and is therefore redundant, because you are already referring to
> "the following examples".
Hm, ok, so:
Index: porting_to.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-7/porting_to.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 porting_to.html
--- porting_to.html 7 Feb 2017 14:22:39 -0000 1.5
+++ porting_to.html 8 Feb 2017 17:44:57 -0000
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@
<p>
As a consequence, the following examples are invalid and G++ will no longer
-compile them:
+compile them, because G++ used to treat <code>this-><em>member</em></code>
+where member has a non-dependent type, as type-dependent, and now it doesn't.
</p>
<pre><code>
Marek