This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/24/2017 09:13 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 01/23/2017 05:01 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:I suppose adding a tsubst flag isn't too horrible. But then we also need to audit other uses of build_value_init to decide whether they should build a cleanup or not.
@@ -8055,7 +8055,8 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *can else if (default_ctor_p (fn)) { if (is_dummy_object (argarray[0])) - return force_target_expr (DECL_CONTEXT (fn), void_node, complain); + return force_target_expr (DECL_CONTEXT (fn), void_node, + complain | tf_no_cleanup);
This is the wrong place for this; we don't know at this point whether we're in a new-expression or actually creating a temporary. I think we want to add this flag in the call to build_value_init from build_new_1. And look at other calls to build_value_init to see if they want it as well.
Jason
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |