Re: [PATCH][GIMPLE FE] Add parsing of MEM_REFs

[Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>]

On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Richard Biener wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 01:35:32PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > It also lacks expressiveness when comparing
> > >
> > >   short s;
> > >   s_1 = (short) 1;
> > >   s_2 = short (1);
> > >
> > > IMHO having a _Literal somewhere makes it more obvious what is meant
> > > (I'm still going to dump 1u or 1l instead of _Literal (unsigned) 1
> > > of course as that's even more easy to recognize).
> >
> > So, with the _Literal (type) constant syntax, what are we going to emit
> > and parse for __int128 constants?
> > _Literal (__int128) (0x123456ULL << 64 || 0x123456ULL), something else?
>
> Yes, unless we teach libcpp about larger than 64bit literals.

Teaching libcpp about 128bit literals sounds like a much nicer idea 
indeed...

--
Marc Glisse