This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 12/12/16 09:04, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> > > The new test (gcc.target/arm/pr78255-2.c scan-assembler b\\s+bar) > added at r243494 fails on old arm architectures, such as: > * arm-none-linux-gnueabi, forcing -march=armv5t in runtestflags > * arm-none-eabi with default cpu/fpu/mode > > Christophe Hi, Thank you for reporting this Christophe and sorry for the delay. The scan check obviously will not work for targets that do not optimize tailcalls. So I applied this patch as obvious in revision r243826, such that the test also accepts direct non-tailcalls, i.e. 'bl?' rather than 'b'. The test is really to make sure a direct call is not turned into an indirect call. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-12-20 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com> * gcc.target/arm/pr78255-2.c: Fix to work for targets that do not optimize for tailcall.
Attachment:
diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |