Re: [PATCH] omp-low.c split

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:39:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:08:21 +0100, Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> wrote:
> > this is the promised attempt at splitting omp-low.c [...]
> 
> Yay!  \o/
> 
> I have not yet had a chance to review/test this patch, but I plan to.
> 
> A few initial comments from the "bike shed departement"; I understand in
> GCC sources it will not be easy to rename stuff (such as files) later, so
> we should get the names agreed upon early:
> 
> Generally, I agree with your division of "omp-low.c" parts.
> 
> >   - move everything that is part of pass_oacc_device_lower,
> >     pass_omp_device_lower and pass_omp_target_link to a new file
> >     omp-device.h,
> 
> Should we call this file "omp-offload.c", as offloading is what this
> deals with, is the term we agreed to generally use (as far as I can
> tell)?

That would be fine with me too.

> >   - move all pre-lowering gridification stuff to a new file
> >     omp-grid.c.  [...]
> 
> Is that code generic enough to not call this file "omp-hsa.c" or similar?

And this as well.  But omp-grid.c is fine too.

> >   - I moved stuff that was used from all over the place to a new file
> >     omp-general.c (unless it would mean exposing omp_region or
> >     omp_context types).
> 
> I'd have called that simply "omp.c".

The problem with that is that the corresponding header can't be called
omp.h for obvious reasons, we already have one with very different meaning.

	Jakub