This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] avoid calling alloca(0)

From: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:29:35 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid calling alloca(0)
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <AM4PR0701MB2162920C363D6EC5D8DCB3DAE4B00@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <2915e7f6-99ce-e8e2-2001-6b65bbaeb345@gmail.com> <AM4PR0701MB21627E35E39F67C1ABC8C437E4B00@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <17b7b776-dfba-c3e9-3812-a1b82fcb5b40@gmail.com> <AM4PR0701MB2162A36C34B270B040C6850CE4B30@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <054dca99-7ba0-2363-ff47-8e3d759765b6@gmail.com> <20161120061802.GU3541@tucnak.redhat.com>

On 11/19/2016 11:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 04:43:29PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:

Thanks for calling out the realloc(0, p) case!  Realloc(0, p) is


??  The DR you refer to deprecates realloc(p, 0), not realloc(0, p).


We are discussing zero size allocation so I was obviously referring
to realloc(p, 0).  Bernd had the arguments in the right order in
his message and I transposed them by mistake in my reply.

Martin

References:
- Re: [PATCH] avoid calling alloca(0)
  - From: Bernd Edlinger
- Re: [PATCH] avoid calling alloca(0)
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [PATCH] avoid calling alloca(0)
  - From: Bernd Edlinger
- Re: [PATCH] avoid calling alloca(0)
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [PATCH] avoid calling alloca(0)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]