This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Change default level for -Wimplicit-fallthrough


On 2016.11.03 at 14:47 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:35:57PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > I don't have gathered detailed statistics. But for example a simple
> > /* drop through */ in a package header file will of course cause many
> > bogus warnings during the build on level 2.
> > For the Linux kernel false positives decrease ~20% when switching from
> > level 3 to 1.
> 
> One would have to count only warnings with unique locus (i.e. sort -u them
> after grepping them from logs).
> But even with 20%, if one spends the energy to analyze the 80%, where
> one actually has to analyze the code, just mechanically changing a couple of
> common comment kinds into more standardized one isn't going to be
> significant.

I should have written: For the Linux kernel the number of warnings
dropped by 20% (going from level 3 to 1) and all of them turned out to
be false positives. And yes, I have used "sort -u".
I'm not sure if I would call 20% insignificant.

-- 
Markus


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]