This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4)
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:40:28 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1518726.5fkcUnkpqM@arcturus.home> <1655866.vCpVy9sPsK@polaris>
On Okt 16 2016, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html
>> It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the
>> documentation.
>>
>> As discussed, I'm going to split it into 4 parts: common infrastructure, Ada
>> front-end bits, individual back-end changes, testsuite. It was
>> bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-suse-linux but AdaCore has been using
>> it on native platforms (Linux, Windows, Solaris, etc) and various
>> architectures (x86, PowerPC, SPARC, ARM, etc) for years.
>
> I've installed part #1, #2, #4 and part #3 for x86, PowerPC, SPARC and IA-64.
> The PowerPC and SPARC bits as approved, the x86 and IA-64 bits as obvious.
On ia64 I get this regression:
FAIL: gcc.dg/Wtrampolines.c (test for warnings, line 31)
Since ia64 never uses trampolines this is probably ok and the test
should be adjusted.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."