This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ping * 2] remove optab functions for [us]divmod_optab in optabs.def
- From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh dot kulkarni at linaro dot org>
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:33:22 +0530
- Subject: Re: [ping * 2] remove optab functions for [us]divmod_optab in optabs.def
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAAgBjMnMP6J8wMW6E1sGmY2Jne46hymvTpA=KFcK9WKx2wW++A@mail.gmail.com> <5ed911f8-ffc6-63e0-890d-a637bff9981a@redhat.com> <CAAgBjMk+6tuwGb02W0s46vuAZW5pvac+KKB7+gx7yrL7=c9_Mg@mail.gmail.com> <92c6b8e3-397f-b2a8-9631-3000fa98980c@redhat.com>
On 13 October 2016 at 22:54, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 07:18 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 16:56, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/06/2016 07:43 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pinging patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01038.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly this is a latent issue where nonexistant
>>> libfunc
>>> names are stored (but not currently used). If that's correct, then OK.
>>
>> Hi Bernd,
>> AFAIU it's indeed a latent issue with optab_libfunc() returning
>> non-existent libfunc
>> names.
>
>
> [...]
>
>> It seems probably this code-path never got triggered to generate call
>> to "__udivmoddi4" or "__divmoddi4"
>> and the issue remained latent.
>> Is the patch OK to commit ?
>
>
> Yes, I think so. Thanks,
Committed as r241147.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Prathamesh
>
>
> Bernd
>