This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCJ-patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 04:03:14 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <FB08E20B-5ED1-45BA-BFA0-11E7807840D2@gmail.com> <68b0da2b-6f38-cde4-72a9-1cf42a629996@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc1JztxWWKRVhyv91RoOwEk8ePawpZZK8w=RhQvB0uDk+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 05/09/16 17:15, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On September 5, 2016 5:13:06 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this
>>>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted
>>>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion,
>>>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch
>>>> if anyone would like to try it.
>>>
>>> Isn't there also java specific C++ frontend parts?
>>
>> There certainly are, but deleting them without breaking anything else
>> is going to be rather delicate. I'm trying to do this one step at a
>> time, rather cautiously.
>
> Ok, that sounds reasonable.
>
> You have my approval for this first part then. Please wait until after the
> GNU Cauldron to allow other global reviewers to object.
I am fine with this. It seems like the right move, alas.
Ian