This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCJ-patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 11:08:31 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <FB08E20B-5ED1-45BA-BFA0-11E7807840D2@gmail.com> <68b0da2b-6f38-cde4-72a9-1cf42a629996@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc1JztxWWKRVhyv91RoOwEk8ePawpZZK8w=RhQvB0uDk+w@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 05/09/16 17:15, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On September 5, 2016 5:13:06 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this
> >>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted
> >>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion,
> >>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch
> >>> if anyone would like to try it.
> >>
> >> Isn't there also java specific C++ frontend parts?
> >
> > There certainly are, but deleting them without breaking anything else
> > is going to be rather delicate. I'm trying to do this one step at a
> > time, rather cautiously.
>
> Ok, that sounds reasonable.
>
> You have my approval for this first part then. Please wait until after the
> GNU Cauldron to allow other global reviewers to object.
No objection from me.
Jakub