This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/71831 - __builtin_object_size poor results with no optimization


On 08/21/2016 02:29 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:



gcc-71831.w.diff


PR tree-optimization/71831 - __builtin_object_size poor results with no
	optimization

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-08-21  Martin Sebor  <msebor@redhat.com>

	PR tree-optimization/71831
	* gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-16.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-17.c: New test.

gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-08-21  Martin Sebor  <msebor@redhat.com>

	PR tree-optimization/71831
	* tree-object-size.h: Return bool instead of the size and add
	argument for the size.
	* tree-object-size.c (compute_object_offset): Update signature.
	(addr_object_size): Same.
	(compute_builtin_object_size): Return bool instead of the size
	and add argument for the size.  Handle POINTER_PLUS_EXPR when
	optimization is disabled.
	(expr_object_size): Adjust.
	(plus_stmt_object_size): Adjust.
	(pass_object_sizes::execute): Adjust.
	* builtins.c (fold_builtin_object_size): Adjust.
	* doc/extend.texi (Object Size Checking): Update.
	* ubsan.c (instrument_object_size): Adjust.
So just to be sure, this change really only helps with our ability to discover object sizes with -O0. Essentially when the objsz pass isn't run. That's my reading and I just want to make sure I read it correctly.

Assuming that is the intent here, this is OK for the trunk.

jeff



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]