This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [v3 PATCH] Implement C++17 variable templates for type traits.


On 31 July 2016 at 14:49, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
> A number of tests are now failing because their dg-error lines need
> adjusting:
>
> FAIL: 20_util/declval/requirements/1_neg.cc  (test for errors, line 2259)
> FAIL: 20_util/declval/requirements/1_neg.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 20_util/duration/literals/range.cc  (test for errors, line 796)
> FAIL: 20_util/duration/literals/range.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg1.cc  (test for errors, line
> 246)
> FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg1.cc (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg2.cc  (test for errors, line
> 247)
> FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg2.cc (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg3.cc  (test for errors, line
> 249)
> FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg3.cc (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: 20_util/make_signed/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc  (test for errors,
> line 1924)
> FAIL: 20_util/make_signed/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc  (test for errors,
> line 1777)
> FAIL: 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc  (test for errors,
> line 1820)
> FAIL: 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: 20_util/ratio/operations/ops_overflow_neg.cc  (test for errors, line
> 435)
> FAIL: 20_util/ratio/operations/ops_overflow_neg.cc (test for excess errors)
>
> Somebody didn't run the whole testsuite.


I will send a patch shortly.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]