This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)

From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>, David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:12:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <5776B33E.2080504@gmail.com> <6eb7cd2c-b7ae-ae84-f00e-40283c9fda84@redhat.com> <20160712095426.GZ7387@tucnak.redhat.com> <3d4b71a1-5cfc-dbb7-e2a2-88c15b401407@redhat.com> <5785028B.4040508@gmail.com> <1468335679.13104.31.camel@redhat.com> <578513D2.7050904@gmail.com>

On 12/07/16 16:59, Martin Sebor wrote:

You're probably right.  I suspect I have a tendency to overuse
the quotes (e.g, the -Wplacement-new warning also quotes the
sizes).  If there aren't yet (I vague recall coming across
something on the GCC Wiki but can't find it now), it would be
helpful to put in place some diagnostic style conventions like
there are for formatting code to guide us in cases like this.
I'm willing to help put the document together or add this to
it if one already exists.


https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DiagnosticsGuidelines

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
  - From: Martin Sebor

References:
- [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
  - From: David Malcolm
- Re: [PATCH] - improve sprintf buffer overflow detection (middle-end/49905)
  - From: Martin Sebor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]