This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[C++ PATCH] Fix error recovery in tsubst_baselink (PR c++/71826)


Hi!

Most of the spots in tsubst_baselink that actually access baselink after
it has been assigned lookup_fnfields () test that it is a BASELINK_P, except
one - the BASELINK_OPTYPE update.  lookup_fnfields can return
error_mark_node though, perhaps something else too.  The patch just follows
what the surrounding code does.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2016-07-11  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c++/71826
	* pt.c (tsubst_baselink): Only set BASELINK_OPTYPE for BASELINK_P.

	* g++.dg/template/pr71826.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/pt.c.jj	2016-07-11 11:14:28.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/pt.c	2016-07-11 12:30:45.939554745 +0200
@@ -13734,7 +13734,8 @@ tsubst_baselink (tree baselink, tree obj
 		  BASELINK_FUNCTIONS (baselink),
 		  template_args);
     /* Update the conversion operator type.  */
-    BASELINK_OPTYPE (baselink) = optype;
+    if (BASELINK_P (baselink))
+      BASELINK_OPTYPE (baselink) = optype;
 
     if (!object_type)
       object_type = current_class_type;
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr71826.C.jj	2016-07-11 12:34:51.406568756 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr71826.C	2016-07-11 12:33:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/71826
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+template <class> struct A { int i; };	// { dg-message "note" }
+struct B { void i () {} };		// { dg-message "note" }
+template <class T> struct C : A <T>, B
+{ 
+  void f () { i (); }			// { dg-error "is ambiguous" }
+};
+
+int
+main ()
+{ 
+  C <int> c;
+  c.f ();
+  return 0;
+}

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]