This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Determine more IVs to be non-overflowing


On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> Hi,
> i sent the email before, but it seems it never left my machine. Sorry for
> possible duplicates.  This is updated version which does not overflow (by
> capping nit), but still using widest_int for the calculatoins. It seems more
> readable to do so than using wi:add/wi:mult/wi:lt and overflow checks, but
> i can definitly update the patch to do it, too.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
> 
> Honza
> 
> 	* tree-scalar-evolution.h (iv_can_overflow_p): Declare.
> 	* tree-scalar-evolution.c (iv_can_overflow_p): New funcition.
> 	(simple_iv): Use it.
> 	* tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (nowrap_type_p): Use ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-14.c: New testcase.
> 
> Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-14.c
> ===================================================================
> --- testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-14.c	(revision 0)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-14.c	(working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-ivopts-details" } */
> +int a[100];
> +void t(unsigned int n)
> +{
> +  unsigned int i;
> +  for (i=0; i<n; i++)
> +     a[i]++;
> +}
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Overflowness wrto loop niter:	No-overflow"  "ivopts" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Overflowness wrto loop niter:	Overflow" "ivopts" } } */
> Index: tree-scalar-evolution.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tree-scalar-evolution.c	(revision 237856)
> +++ tree-scalar-evolution.c	(working copy)
> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
>  #include "params.h"
>  #include "tree-ssa-propagate.h"
>  #include "gimple-fold.h"
> +#include "print-tree.h"

Don't see you need this.

>  static tree analyze_scalar_evolution_1 (struct loop *, tree, tree);
>  static tree analyze_scalar_evolution_for_address_of (struct loop *loop,
> @@ -3309,6 +3310,60 @@ scev_reset (void)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +/* Return true if the IV calculation in TYPE can overflow based on the knowledge
> +   of the upper bound on the number of iterations of LOOP, the BASE and STEP
> +   of IV.
> +
> +   We do not use information whether TYPE can overflow so it is safe to
> +   use this test even for derived IVs not computed every iteration or
> +   hypotetical IVs to be inserted into code.  */
> +
> +bool
> +iv_can_overflow_p (struct loop *loop, tree type, tree base, tree step)

Exporting this is also not necessary?

> +{
> +  widest_int nit;
> +  wide_int base_min, base_max, step_min, step_max, type_min, type_max;
> +  signop sgn = TYPE_SIGN (type);
> +  signop base_sgn = TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (base));
> +  signop step_sgn = TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (step));
> +
> +  if (step == 0)
> +    return false;

Err - you probably mean

     if (integer_zerop (step))

here?  your check is a NULL pointer check ...

> +
> +  if (TREE_CODE (base) == INTEGER_CST)
> +    base_min = base_max = base;
> +  else if (TREE_CODE (base) == SSA_NAME && !POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (base))
> +	   && get_range_info (base, &base_min, &base_max) == VR_RANGE)

split &&s into separate lines.  Also use && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P rather
than a negative check.  This means that pointer IVs are always
considered to overflow.

> +    ;
> +  else
> +    return true;
> +
> +  if (TREE_CODE (step) == INTEGER_CST)
> +    step_min = step_max = step;
> +  else if (TREE_CODE (step) == SSA_NAME && !POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (step))
> +	   && get_range_info (step, &step_min, &step_max) == VR_RANGE)

Likewise.

> +    ;
> +  else
> +    return true;
> +
> +  if (!get_max_loop_iterations (loop, &nit))
> +    return true;
> +
> +  type_min = wi::min_value (type);
> +  type_max = wi::max_value (type);
> +  /* Watch overflow.  */
> +  if ((widest_int)1 << TYPE_PRECISION (type) < nit)
> +    return true;

TYPE_PRECISION (type) - 1?  The comment can be improved I think.

> +  if ((widest_int::from (base_max, base_sgn)
> +       + widest_int::from (step_max, step_sgn) * (nit + 1))
> +       > widest_int::from (type_max, sgn)
> +      || (widest_int::from (type_min, sgn)
> +	  > (widest_int::from (base_min, base_sgn)
> +	     + widest_int::from (step_min, step_sgn) * (nit + 1))))
> +    return true;

and this lacks any comment...  so it decodes to

 (base_max + step_max * (nit + 1) > type_max)
 || (type_min > base_min + step_min * (nit + 1))

and it basically assumes infinite precision arithmetic for
the computation.  As mentioned previously for __int128 widest_int
does _not_ guarantee this so you need to use FIXED_WIDE_INT
with a precision of WIDE_INT_MAX_PRECISION * 2 (+1?) like VRP does.

Note as both type_min/max and base_min/max are wide_ints the above
might be simplified

  step_max * (nit + 1) > type_max - base_max

where the subtraction can be carried out in wide_int(?) and you
should also CSE nit + 1 or transform it further to

  step_max * nit > type_max - base_max - step_max

where if I understand correctly, if type_max - base_max - step_max
underflows we already wrap.

Thanks,
Richard.

> +  return false;
> +}
> +
>  /* Checks whether use of OP in USE_LOOP behaves as a simple affine iv with
>     respect to WRTO_LOOP and returns its base and step in IV if possible
>     (see analyze_scalar_evolution_in_loop for more details on USE_LOOP
> @@ -3375,8 +3430,12 @@ simple_iv (struct loop *wrto_loop, struc
>    if (tree_contains_chrecs (iv->base, NULL))
>      return false;
>  
> -  iv->no_overflow = (!folded_casts && ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> -		     && TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type));
> +  iv->no_overflow = !folded_casts && nowrap_type_p (type);
> +
> +  if (!iv->no_overflow
> +      && !iv_can_overflow_p (wrto_loop, type, iv->base, iv->step))
> +    iv->no_overflow = true;
> +
>  
>    /* Try to simplify iv base:
>  
> Index: tree-scalar-evolution.h
> ===================================================================
> --- tree-scalar-evolution.h	(revision 237856)
> +++ tree-scalar-evolution.h	(working copy)
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ extern unsigned int scev_const_prop (voi
>  extern bool expression_expensive_p (tree);
>  extern bool simple_iv (struct loop *, struct loop *, tree, struct affine_iv *,
>  		       bool);
> +extern bool iv_can_overflow_p (struct loop *, tree, tree, tree);
>  extern tree compute_overall_effect_of_inner_loop (struct loop *, tree);
>  
>  /* Returns the basic block preceding LOOP, or the CFG entry block when
> Index: tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tree-ssa-loop-niter.c	(revision 237856)
> +++ tree-ssa-loop-niter.c	(working copy)
> @@ -4105,7 +4105,7 @@ n_of_executions_at_most (gimple *stmt,
>  bool
>  nowrap_type_p (tree type)
>  {
> -  if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> +  if (ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
>        && TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type))
>      return true;
>  
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]