This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH][i386] Add -march=native support for VIA nano CPUs
- From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- To: "J. Mayer" <l_indien at magic dot fr>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:38:39 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][i386] Add -march=native support for VIA nano CPUs
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAFULd4Y4ZM_WGAozF=NVaE-uabDufArq=KEi53=JVPzqFVHLMw at mail dot gmail dot com> <1464559768 dot 9217 dot 68 dot camel at magic dot fr>
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:09 AM, J. Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 21:12 +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> >
>> > When trying to compile using -march=native on a VIA nano CPU, gcc
>> > selects "-march=core2" "-mtune=i386" then is unable to compile, as
>> > this
>> > creates a conflicts between 32 bits and 64 bits compilation modes,
>> > as
>> > show by the following test:
>> [...]
>>
>> >
>> > --- gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c.origÃÃ2015-02-02
>> > 05:20:49.000000000
>> > +0100
>> > +++ gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.cÃÃÃÃÃÃÃ2015-08-23
>> > 01:11:03.000000000
>> > +0200
>> > @@ -601,15 +601,20 @@
>> > ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃswitch (family)
>> > ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃ{
>> > ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃcase 6:
>> > -ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃif (model > 9)
>> The patch was corrupted by your mailer. But - can you please open a
>> bugreport, and refer reposted patch to this bugreport? This way, the
>> problem (and the patch) won't get forgotten.
>>
>> Uros.
>>
>
> Sorry for that, might be because of UTF-8 encoding.
> I already opened a bug many monthes ago, ID 67310:
> <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310>
> I just updated the patch against current git repository, the only
> difference between previous versions are diff offsets.
Can you please test the patch that is attached to the bugreport?
Thanks,
Uros.