This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA 1/2]: Don't ignore target_header_dir when deciding inhibit_libc
- From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- To: Andre dot SimoesDiasVieira at arm dot com ("Andre Vieira (lists)")
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:51:35 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [RFA 1/2]: Don't ignore target_header_dir when deciding inhibit_libc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> On 07/04/16 10:30, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> > On 17/03/16 16:33, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >> On 23/10/15 12:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >>> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Index: gcc/configure.ac
> >>>> ===================================================================
> >>>> --- gcc/configure.ac (revision 228530)
> >>>> +++ gcc/configure.ac (working copy)
> >>>> @@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ elif test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; t
> >>>> fi
> >>>>
> >>>> if test x$host != x$target || test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; then
> >>>> - if test "x$with_headers" != x; then
> >>>> + if test "x$with_headers" != x && test "x$with_headers" != xyes; then
> >>>> target_header_dir=$with_headers
> >>>> elif test "x$with_sysroot" = x; then
> >>>>
> >>>> target_header_dir="${test_exec_prefix}/${target_noncanonical}/sys-include"
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm missing the beginning of this conversation, but this looks like a
> >>> reasonable change (avoiding target_header_dir=yes for --with-headers).
> >>> So, approved.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Bernd
> >>>
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> I was wondering why this never made it to trunk. I am currently running
> >> into an issue that this patch would fix.
Seems I never actually checked this in, even though it was approved.
Thanks for the reminder, I've now checked the patch in.
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com