This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Introduce BIT_FIELD_INSERT


On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 01:41:01PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> I'd say ppc and aarch64 are fine.  Thanks for noticing.

So like this then?

2016-05-20  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR tree-optimization/29756
	gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-6.c: Add -Wno-psabi -w to dg-options.
	Add -msse2 for x86 and -maltivec for powerpc.  Use scan-tree-dump-times
	only on selected targets where V4SImode vectors are known to be
	supported.

--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-6.c.jj	2016-05-20 12:44:33.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-6.c	2016-05-20 13:49:19.880961132 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-ccp1" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-ccp1 -Wno-psabi -w" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-msse2" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-maltivec" { target powerpc_altivec_ok } } */
 
 typedef int v4si __attribute__((vector_size (4 * sizeof (int))));
 
@@ -30,4 +32,4 @@ v4si test4 (v4si v, int i)
   return v;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Now a gimple register: v" 4 "ccp1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Now a gimple register: v" 4 "ccp1" { target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* aarch64*-*-* spu*-*-* } || { powerpc_altivec_ok } } } } } */


	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]