This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 05/03/2016 03:24 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
Err, is loop depth accurate in 254r.sched1? In the ira dump, I see them all at loop depth 1. So I expect that DF doesn't see the death because we're in a loop.looks like we should have a death note? I could see how such a move would create a new death if the def was moved into a loop from outside.We won't move into a loop from outside. if (bb_loop_depth (use_bb) > bb_loop_depth (def_bb)) continue;
I know, I was just uncertain whether that information is actually accurate.If that is all ok and we just have a really odd cfg, then your patch is ok with a better comment as to which situations can cause the problem.
Bernd
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |