It is not fatal, but still ugly. The problem is that the function has
int i;
...
for (i = 0; ...)
...
for (unsigned int i = ... )
...
for (i = 0; ...)
This patch just declares the var in the only affected loop, so that the warning
is not emitted, unless we start checking -Wshadow warnings, I think this is
good enough.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2016-04-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* reorg.c (try_merge_delay_insns): Declare i inside the last
for loop to avoid warning.
--- gcc/reorg.c.jj 2016-04-26 08:08:16.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/reorg.c 2016-04-26 11:13:53.212030471 +0200
@@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ try_merge_delay_insns (rtx_insn *insn, r
INSN_ANNULLED_BRANCH_P (delay_insn) = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (PATTERN (insn), 0); i++)
+ for (int i = 0; i < XVECLEN (PATTERN (insn), 0); i++)
INSN_FROM_TARGET_P (XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, i)) = 0;
}
}