This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Fortran, Patch, pr65795, v1] Segfault (invalid write) for ALLOCATE statement involving COARRAYS
- From: Dominique d'HumiÃres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
- To: Andre Vehreschild <vehre at gmx dot de>
- Cc: "jvdelisle at charter dot net" <jvdelisle at charter dot net>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 23:46:34 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Fortran, Patch, pr65795, v1] Segfault (invalid write) for ALLOCATE statement involving COARRAYS
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <7DD7789A-5E9B-4CFF-B40B-D92665A5AB27 at lps dot ens dot fr> <F5DC95B1-A4F9-4A23-8C26-063E48814D28 at gmx dot de>
> Le 3 avr. 2016 Ã 23:38, Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> a Ãcrit :
>
> Hi Dominique,
>
> I thought that was implicit, isn't it?
I donât think so and I see in the log files
gcc/testsuite/gfortran4/gfortran.sum:UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/coarray_allocate_6.f08 -O0 scan-tree-dump-not original "c.caf.x = 0B"
> Is only the removal of the file implicit?
Yes,
> I will add the option to be on the safe side.
Thanks,
Dominique
>
> - Andre
>
> Am 3. April 2016 22:57:48 MESZ, schrieb "Dominique d'HumiÃres" <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>:
> Andre,
>
> Does not the test gfortran.dg/coarray_allocate_6.f08 require a -fdump-tree-original in the dg-options list?
>
> Thanks for the patch,
>
> Dominique
>
>
> --
> Andre Vehreschild * Kreuzherrenstr. 8 * 52062 Aachen
> Tel.: +49 241 929 10 18 * vehre@gmx.de