This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Split out armv7ve effective target check


Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00162.html

Thanks,
Kyrill
On 02/03/16 13:32, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,

I'm seeing the fails:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_2.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+, r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_5.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+, r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_8.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+, r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1

when testing an arm multilib with /-march=armv7-a.

The tests have an effective target check for armv7ve but it doesn't work because
under the hood the check is the same as for armv7-a, that is it checks for the __ARM_ARCH_7A__
predefine which is set for both march values.

To check for armv7ve using predefines we need to check for both __ARM_ARCH_7A__ and for the hardware
integer division predefine, making armv7ve special.

So this patch separates the effective target check definition from the rest of the architectures
and defines it appropriately.

With this patch the aforementioned tests appear UNSUPPORTED when testing the /-march=armv7-a multilib.

Ok for trunk?

Thanks,
Kyrill

2016-03-02  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>

    * lib/target-supports.exp: Remove v7ve entry from loop
    creating effective target checks.
    (check_effective_target_arm_arch_v7ve_ok): New procedure.
    (add_options_for_arm_arch_v7ve): Likewise.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]