Re: [PATCH] Additional tests for 69987, 69989, 69740

[Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>]

On 03/02/2016 05:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Dominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:22:39AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > Two additional regression tests for problems exposed by the 69740
> > > patches. They tickle a different path than the test HJ already
> > > checked in.  Obviously the idea is to have these in place so that
> > > when we attack 69740 again, we don't regress these issues.
> > >
> > > Installed on the trunk after verifying they PASS on the trunk.
> >
> > This on fails on s390x with -m31 (but works with -m64).  (Without
> > trying it I assume it also fails on s390).
> >
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr69987.f90
> >
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr69987.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
> > Excess errors:
> > f951: Warning: -fprefetch-loop-arrays not supported for this target (try -march switches)
> >
> > Ciao
> >
> > Dominik ^_^  ^_^
>
> Other testcases simply add -w when using -fprefetch-loop-arrays....
That seems to work (tested with cross compiler).  I'll commit shortly.

Thanks,
jeff