Re: lra-remat issues (PR68730)

[Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt at redhat dot com>]

On 02/15/2016 02:13 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/04/2016 09:27 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > > After a few false starts, I came up with the patch below, which keeps
> > > track of not just the candidate insn, but also an activation insn, and
> > > chooses candidates only if they are both available and active. Besides
> > > passing a new arg to create_cand, the changes in create_cands are
> > > mostly cosmetic to make the function less confusing. This was
> > > bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. Ok?
> > The patch looks ok for me.  Thanks for working on the PR, Bernd.
>
> I should get in the habit of asking "ok everywhere?" Can I put this on
> gcc-5-branch as well?

... and I managed to confuse myself about which LRA issue I had approval 
for on gcc-5-branch, and checked it in. Sorry. If I don't hear back 
until tomorrow I'll revert it.


Bernd