This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm

From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt at redhat dot com>, David Wohlferd <dw at LimeGreenSocks dot com>, Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, "jason at redhat dot com" <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "segher at kernel dot crashing dot org" <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>, "Paul_Koning at Dell dot com" <Paul_Koning at Dell dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:03:48 -0700
Subject: Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <56A54EF9 dot 8060006 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <56A61442 dot 3090803 at redhat dot com> <56A9C134 dot 1030500 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <56B80F57 dot 9020606 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <HE1PR07MB09059C5C9C060394C61A1232E4D50 at HE1PR07MB0905 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <56BBCC90 dot 9020001 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <56BCAB73 dot 20506 at redhat dot com> <56BD8427 dot 4050405 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <56BDD550 dot 3050908 at redhat dot com>

On 02/12/2016 05:51 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:

On 02/12/2016 08:05 AM, David Wohlferd wrote:

Actually, it was my intent that this apply to v6.  It's not like there
is a significant change here.  We're documenting long-time behavior, and
adding a (disabled) warning.


The doc patch (minus mentioning the warning) could go in now, but for
gcc-6 we're at a stage where we're only accepting regression fixes with
very few exceptions. If you can convince a RM that this is important
enough then it could still go in.

I looked at the last version of the patch I saw and this is myconclusion as well. If you would like me to commit just the doc change(minus the references to the new warning) now, please split the patchand I will do that. But, I cannot commit the change to add the newwarning during Stage 4 without approval from a RM.


-Sandra

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: David Wohlferd

References:
- Re: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: David Wohlferd
- AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: Bernd Edlinger
- Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: David Wohlferd
- Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: David Wohlferd
- Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]