This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm

From: David Wohlferd <dw at LimeGreenSocks dot com>
To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt at redhat dot com>, Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, "jason at redhat dot com" <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "segher at kernel dot crashing dot org" <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>, "Paul_Koning at Dell dot com" <Paul_Koning at Dell dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, "bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de" <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, David Wohlferd <dw at LimeGreenSocks dot com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:07:39 -0800
Subject: Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <56A54EF9 dot 8060006 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <56A61442 dot 3090803 at redhat dot com> <56A9C134 dot 1030500 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <56B80F57 dot 9020606 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <HE1PR07MB09059C5C9C060394C61A1232E4D50 at HE1PR07MB0905 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <56BBCC90 dot 9020001 at LimeGreenSocks dot com> <56BCAB73 dot 20506 at redhat dot com> <56BCB0DA dot 1040806 at codesourcery dot com>

On 2/11/2016 8:03 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:

On 02/11/2016 08:40 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
But again, if someone feels the docs patch as posted is preferrable, go
ahead and approve it (for stage1 I assume).
TBH, I haven't looked at the documentation patch at all; I've beenignoring this issue because (a) I thought the technical details werestill under discussion and (b) adding a new command-line option isstage 1 material not suitable to commit right now anyway.
I'll take a look at the docs once the name and behavior of the newoption have been settled upon.

So far, no one has suggested any changes to the behavior. And we seemto have settled on a name.

dw

References:
- Re: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: David Wohlferd
- AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: Bernd Edlinger
- Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: David Wohlferd
- Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
  - From: Sandra Loosemore

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]