This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c++/21802 (two-stage name lookup fails for operators)
- From: Patrick Palka <patrick at parcs dot ath dot cx>
- To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Patrick Palka <patrick at parcs dot ath dot cx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:19:16 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c++/21802 (two-stage name lookup fails for operators)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1449783827-27797-1-git-send-email-patrick at parcs dot ath dot cx>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx> wrote:
> This patch fixes name-lookup of operators in template definitions whose
> operands are non-dependent expressions, i.e. PR c++/21802 (and
> incidentally 53223).
>
> The approach that this patch takes is to detect when build_new_op()
> returns a call to an overloaded function and to store a call to this
> overload intothe template AST instead of storing the raw operator
> (an operator would be erroneously subject to overload resolution during
> instantiation).
>
> The new function build_min_non_dep_op_overload is the workhorse of the
> patch. It reconstructs the CALL_EXPR that would have been built had an
> explicit operator+, operator* etc call been used, i.e. had the overload
> gone through finish_call_expr() / build_new_method_call() instead of
> through build_new_op(). The parameter OVERLOAD of this new function is
> probably not strictly necessary -- one can probably just look at the
> CALL_EXPR_FN of the parameter NON_DEP to figure out the overload to use
> -- but since the requisite plumbing from build_new_op() already existed
> to conveniently get at the overload information I thought I might as
> well use it.
>
> I have also created a test case that hopefully exercises all the changes
> that were made and to verify that these operator calls are being built
> correctly.
>
> Does this approach seem adequate? Bootstrap and regtesting in progress
> on x86_64, OK to commit if testing succeeds?
Unfortunately this patch doesn't work properly on operator overloads
that are defined as friend functions. E.g. the following now fails to
compile:
struct A
{
friend int operator* (A);
};
template <typename T>
void func(T t)
{
A x;
int y = *x;
}
int main()
{
func(0);
}
I think this happens because KOENIG_LOOKUP_P is not being properly set
in in the CALL_EXPR we are reconstructing. Not sure how to fix that
yet.
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c++/21802
> PR c++/53223
> * cp-tree.h (build_min_non_dep_op_overload): Declare.
> * tree.c (build_min_non_dep_op_overload): Define.
> * typeck.c (build_x_indirect_ref): Use
> build_min_non_dep_op_overload when the given expression
> has been resolved to an operator overload.
> (build_x_binary_op): Likewise.
> (build_x_array_ref): Likewise.
> (build_x_unary_op): Likewise.
> (build_x_compound_expr): Likewise.
> (build_x_modify_expr): Likewise.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c++/21802
> PR c++/53223
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr53223.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/lookup/pr21802.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/lookup/two-stage4.C: Remove XFAIL.
> ---
> gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 1 +
> gcc/cp/tree.c | 64 ++++++++
> gcc/cp/typeck.c | 100 +++++++++---
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr53223.C | 35 ++++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr21802.C | 271 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/two-stage4.C | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 453 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr53223.C
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr21802.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> index 6190f4e..3487d77 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> @@ -6513,6 +6513,7 @@ extern tree build_min (enum tree_code, tree, ...);
> extern tree build_min_nt_loc (location_t, enum tree_code,
> ...);
> extern tree build_min_non_dep (enum tree_code, tree, ...);
> +extern tree build_min_non_dep_op_overload (enum tree_code, tree, tree, ...);
> extern tree build_min_non_dep_call_vec (tree, tree, vec<tree, va_gc> *);
> extern tree build_cplus_new (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t);
> extern tree build_aggr_init_expr (tree, tree);
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.c b/gcc/cp/tree.c
> index 5dad0a7..2635736 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/tree.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/tree.c
> @@ -2744,6 +2744,70 @@ build_min_non_dep_call_vec (tree non_dep, tree fn, vec<tree, va_gc> *argvec)
> return convert_from_reference (t);
> }
>
> +/* Similar to build_min_non_dep, but for expressions that have been resolved to
> + a call to an operator overload. OP is the operator that has been
> + overloaded. NON_DEP is the non-dependent expression that's been built,
> + which should be a CALL_EXPR or an INDIRECT_REF to a CALL_EXPR. OVERLOAD is
> + the overload that NON_DEP is calling. */
> +
> +tree
> +build_min_non_dep_op_overload (enum tree_code op,
> + tree non_dep,
> + tree overload, ...)
> +{
> + va_list p;
> + int nargs;
> + tree fn, call;
> + vec<tree, va_gc> *args;
> +
> + if (REFERENCE_REF_P (non_dep))
> + non_dep = TREE_OPERAND (non_dep, 0);
> +
> + nargs = call_expr_nargs (non_dep);
> +
> + if (op == PREINCREMENT_EXPR
> + || op == PREDECREMENT_EXPR)
> + gcc_assert (nargs == 1);
> + else if (op == MODOP_EXPR)
> + gcc_assert (nargs == 2);
> + else
> + gcc_assert (nargs == TREE_CODE_LENGTH (op));
> +
> + args = make_tree_vector ();
> + va_start (p, overload);
> +
> + if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (overload)) == FUNCTION_TYPE)
> + {
> + fn = overload;
> + for (int i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
> + {
> + tree arg = va_arg (p, tree);
> + vec_safe_push (args, arg);
> + }
> + }
> + else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (overload)) == METHOD_TYPE)
> + {
> + tree object = va_arg (p, tree);
> + tree binfo = TYPE_BINFO (TREE_TYPE (object));
> + tree method = build_baselink (binfo, binfo, overload, NULL_TREE);
> + fn = build_min (COMPONENT_REF, TREE_TYPE (overload),
> + object, method, NULL_TREE);
> + for (int i = 1; i < nargs; i++)
> + {
> + tree arg = va_arg (p, tree);
> + vec_safe_push (args, arg);
> + }
> + }
> + else
> + gcc_unreachable ();
> +
> + va_end (p);
> + call = build_min_non_dep_call_vec (non_dep, fn, args);
> + release_tree_vector (args);
> +
> + return call;
> +}
> +
> tree
> get_type_decl (tree t)
> {
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
> index 17671ee..2e5e46e 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
> @@ -2905,6 +2905,7 @@ build_x_indirect_ref (location_t loc, tree expr, ref_operator errorstring,
> {
> tree orig_expr = expr;
> tree rval;
> + tree overload = NULL_TREE;
>
> if (processing_template_decl)
> {
> @@ -2917,12 +2918,18 @@ build_x_indirect_ref (location_t loc, tree expr, ref_operator errorstring,
> }
>
> rval = build_new_op (loc, INDIRECT_REF, LOOKUP_NORMAL, expr,
> - NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE, /*overload=*/NULL, complain);
> + NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE, &overload, complain);
> if (!rval)
> rval = cp_build_indirect_ref (expr, errorstring, complain);
>
> if (processing_template_decl && rval != error_mark_node)
> - return build_min_non_dep (INDIRECT_REF, rval, orig_expr);
> + {
> + if (overload != NULL_TREE)
> + return (build_min_non_dep_op_overload
> + (INDIRECT_REF, rval, overload, orig_expr));
> +
> + return build_min_non_dep (INDIRECT_REF, rval, orig_expr);
> + }
> else
> return rval;
> }
> @@ -3814,12 +3821,13 @@ convert_arguments (tree typelist, vec<tree, va_gc> **values, tree fndecl,
> tree
> build_x_binary_op (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree arg1,
> enum tree_code arg1_code, tree arg2,
> - enum tree_code arg2_code, tree *overload,
> + enum tree_code arg2_code, tree *overload_p,
> tsubst_flags_t complain)
> {
> tree orig_arg1;
> tree orig_arg2;
> tree expr;
> + tree overload = NULL_TREE;
>
> orig_arg1 = arg1;
> orig_arg2 = arg2;
> @@ -3837,7 +3845,10 @@ build_x_binary_op (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree arg1,
> expr = build_m_component_ref (arg1, arg2, complain);
> else
> expr = build_new_op (loc, code, LOOKUP_NORMAL, arg1, arg2, NULL_TREE,
> - overload, complain);
> + &overload, complain);
> +
> + if (overload_p != NULL)
> + *overload_p = overload;
>
> /* Check for cases such as x+y<<z which users are likely to
> misinterpret. But don't warn about obj << x + y, since that is a
> @@ -3853,7 +3864,13 @@ build_x_binary_op (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree arg1,
> arg2_code, orig_arg2);
>
> if (processing_template_decl && expr != error_mark_node)
> - return build_min_non_dep (code, expr, orig_arg1, orig_arg2);
> + {
> + if (overload != NULL_TREE)
> + return (build_min_non_dep_op_overload
> + (code, expr, overload, orig_arg1, orig_arg2));
> +
> + return build_min_non_dep (code, expr, orig_arg1, orig_arg2);
> + }
>
> return expr;
> }
> @@ -3867,6 +3884,7 @@ build_x_array_ref (location_t loc, tree arg1, tree arg2,
> tree orig_arg1 = arg1;
> tree orig_arg2 = arg2;
> tree expr;
> + tree overload = NULL_TREE;
>
> if (processing_template_decl)
> {
> @@ -3879,11 +3897,17 @@ build_x_array_ref (location_t loc, tree arg1, tree arg2,
> }
>
> expr = build_new_op (loc, ARRAY_REF, LOOKUP_NORMAL, arg1, arg2,
> - NULL_TREE, /*overload=*/NULL, complain);
> + NULL_TREE, &overload, complain);
>
> if (processing_template_decl && expr != error_mark_node)
> - return build_min_non_dep (ARRAY_REF, expr, orig_arg1, orig_arg2,
> - NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
> + {
> + if (overload != NULL_TREE)
> + return (build_min_non_dep_op_overload
> + (ARRAY_REF, expr, overload, orig_arg1, orig_arg2));
> +
> + return build_min_non_dep (ARRAY_REF, expr, orig_arg1, orig_arg2,
> + NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
> + }
> return expr;
> }
>
> @@ -5278,6 +5302,7 @@ build_x_unary_op (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, cp_expr xarg,
> tree orig_expr = xarg;
> tree exp;
> int ptrmem = 0;
> + tree overload = NULL_TREE;
>
> if (processing_template_decl)
> {
> @@ -5305,7 +5330,8 @@ build_x_unary_op (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, cp_expr xarg,
> /* Don't look for a function. */;
> else
> exp = build_new_op (loc, code, LOOKUP_NORMAL, xarg, NULL_TREE,
> - NULL_TREE, /*overload=*/NULL, complain);
> + NULL_TREE, &overload, complain);
> +
> if (!exp && code == ADDR_EXPR)
> {
> if (is_overloaded_fn (xarg))
> @@ -5371,8 +5397,14 @@ build_x_unary_op (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, cp_expr xarg,
> }
>
> if (processing_template_decl && exp != error_mark_node)
> - exp = build_min_non_dep (code, exp, orig_expr,
> - /*For {PRE,POST}{INC,DEC}REMENT_EXPR*/NULL_TREE);
> + {
> + if (overload != NULL_TREE)
> + return (build_min_non_dep_op_overload
> + (code, exp, overload, orig_expr, integer_zero_node));
> +
> + exp = build_min_non_dep (code, exp, orig_expr,
> + /*For {PRE,POST}{INC,DEC}REMENT_EXPR*/NULL_TREE);
> + }
> if (TREE_CODE (exp) == ADDR_EXPR)
> PTRMEM_OK_P (exp) = ptrmem;
> return exp;
> @@ -6335,6 +6367,7 @@ build_x_compound_expr (location_t loc, tree op1, tree op2,
> tree result;
> tree orig_op1 = op1;
> tree orig_op2 = op2;
> + tree overload = NULL_TREE;
>
> if (processing_template_decl)
> {
> @@ -6346,12 +6379,18 @@ build_x_compound_expr (location_t loc, tree op1, tree op2,
> }
>
> result = build_new_op (loc, COMPOUND_EXPR, LOOKUP_NORMAL, op1, op2,
> - NULL_TREE, /*overload=*/NULL, complain);
> + NULL_TREE, &overload, complain);
> if (!result)
> result = cp_build_compound_expr (op1, op2, complain);
>
> if (processing_template_decl && result != error_mark_node)
> - return build_min_non_dep (COMPOUND_EXPR, result, orig_op1, orig_op2);
> + {
> + if (overload != NULL_TREE)
> + return (build_min_non_dep_op_overload
> + (COMPOUND_EXPR, result, overload, orig_op1, orig_op2));
> +
> + return build_min_non_dep (COMPOUND_EXPR, result, orig_op1, orig_op2);
> + }
>
> return result;
> }
> @@ -7794,19 +7833,42 @@ cp_expr
> build_x_modify_expr (location_t loc, tree lhs, enum tree_code modifycode,
> tree rhs, tsubst_flags_t complain)
> {
> + tree orig_lhs = lhs;
> + tree orig_rhs = rhs;
> + tree overload = NULL_TREE;
> + tree op = build_nt (modifycode, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
> +
> if (processing_template_decl)
> - return build_min_nt_loc (loc, MODOP_EXPR, lhs,
> - build_min_nt_loc (loc, modifycode, NULL_TREE,
> - NULL_TREE), rhs);
> + {
> + if (modifycode == NOP_EXPR
> + || type_dependent_expression_p (lhs)
> + || type_dependent_expression_p (rhs))
> + return build_min_nt_loc (loc, MODOP_EXPR, lhs,
> + build_min_nt_loc (loc, modifycode, NULL_TREE,
> + NULL_TREE), rhs);
> +
> + lhs = build_non_dependent_expr (lhs);
> + rhs = build_non_dependent_expr (rhs);
> + }
>
> if (modifycode != NOP_EXPR)
> {
> - tree rval = build_new_op (loc, MODIFY_EXPR, LOOKUP_NORMAL, lhs, rhs,
> - make_node (modifycode), /*overload=*/NULL,
> - complain);
> + tree rval = build_new_op (loc, MODIFY_EXPR, LOOKUP_NORMAL,
> + lhs, rhs, op, &overload, complain);
> if (rval)
> {
> + if (rval == error_mark_node)
> + return rval;
> TREE_NO_WARNING (rval) = 1;
> + if (processing_template_decl)
> + {
> + if (overload != NULL_TREE)
> + return (build_min_non_dep_op_overload
> + (MODOP_EXPR, rval, overload, orig_lhs, orig_rhs));
> +
> + return (build_min_non_dep
> + (MODOP_EXPR, rval, orig_lhs, op, orig_rhs));
> + }
> return rval;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr53223.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr53223.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4ca2da1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr53223.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +// PR c++/53223
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +struct A
> +{
> + int good() const;
> + int operator *() const;
> + int operator ++() const;
> +};
> +
> +int operator-- (const A&);
> +
> +template<typename T>
> +void func(T t)
> +{
> + A x;
> + auto &&g1 = x.good();
> + auto &&g2 = x.operator*();
> + auto &&error1 = *x; // { dg-bogus "invalid initialization" }
> + auto &&error2 = ++x; // { dg-bogus "invalid initialization" }
> + auto &&error3 = --x; // { dg-bogus "invalid initialization" }
> +}
> +
> +void func2(int)
> +{
> + A x;
> + auto &&g = *x;
> +}
> +
> +int main()
> +{
> + func(0);
> + func2(0);
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr21802.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr21802.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4909bad
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr21802.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
> +// PR c++/21802
> +// { dg-do run }
> +#include <cassert>
> +
> +struct X;
> +int I = 6;
> +
> +/* A mostly exhaustive and ad-hoc assortment of operator overloads and calls
> + thereof, to stress-test two-stage name lookup of operators inside template
> + definitions and then to verify that the calls get built correctly. */
> +
> +inline int operator+(const X &, int x) { return x; }
> +inline int operator-(const X &, int x) { return x; }
> +inline int operator*(const X &, int x) { return x; }
> +inline int operator/(const X &, int x) { return x; }
> +inline int operator+=(const X &, int x) { return x; }
> +
> +struct X
> +{
> + X () : m (1) { }
> + int operator%(int x) { return m + x; }
> + virtual int operator>>(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator<<(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator&(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator|(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator^(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator&&(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator||(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator==(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator!=(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator<(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator<=(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator>(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator>=(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator*() { return m + I; }
> + int operator!() { return m + I; }
> + int operator~() { return m + I; }
> + int operator++() { return m + I + 100; }
> + int operator--() { return m + I + 100; }
> + int operator++(int) { return m + I; }
> + int operator--(int) { return m + I; }
> + int operator()() { return m + I; }
> + int operator,(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator[](int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator*=(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator-=(int x) { return m + x; }
> + int operator/=(int x) { return m + x; }
> + virtual int operator& () { return m + I; }
> + int m;
> +};
> +struct Y : virtual X
> +{
> + /* Virtual override. */
> + int operator>>(int x) { return m + x + 1; }
> + int operator& () { return m + I + 1; }
> +
> + /* Not virtual. */
> + int operator&(int x) { return m + x + 1; }
> +};
> +
> +/* The folloiwng "FooN" functions each contain a different way to call and to
> + resolve these operator overloads. */
> +
> +template <typename T>
> +void
> +Foo1 (T)
> +{
> + Y x;
> + { int t = x + I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x - I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x * I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x / I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = (x+=I); assert (t == 6); }
> +
> + { int t = x % I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x << I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x | I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x && I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x || I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x == I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x != I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x < I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x <= I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x > I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x >= I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = *x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = !x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = ~x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x++; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x--; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = ++x; assert (t == 107); }
> + { int t = --x; assert (t == 107); }
> + { int t = x (); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x, I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x[I]; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x-=I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x/=I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x*=I); assert (t == 7); }
> +
> + { int t = x >> I; assert (t == 8); }
> + { int t = x & I; assert (t == 8); }
> + { int t = &x; assert (t == 8); }
> +}
> +
> +template <typename T>
> +void
> +Foo2 (T)
> +{
> + X x;
> + { int t = x + I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x - I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x * I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x / I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = (x+=I); assert (t == 6); }
> +
> + { int t = x % I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x >> I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x << I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x | I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x && I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x || I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x == I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x != I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x < I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x <= I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x > I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x >= I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = *x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = !x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = ~x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x++; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x--; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = ++x; assert (t == 107); }
> + { int t = --x; assert (t == 107); }
> + { int t = x (); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x, I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x[I]; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = &x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x-=I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x/=I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x*=I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x & I; assert (t == 7); }
> +}
> +
> +template <typename T>
> +void
> +Foo3 (T)
> +{
> + Y o;
> + X &x = o;
> + { int t = x + I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x - I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x * I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = x / I; assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = (x+=I); assert (t == 6); }
> +
> + { int t = x % I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x << I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x | I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x && I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x || I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x == I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x != I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x < I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x <= I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x > I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x >= I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = *x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = !x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = ~x; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x++; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x--; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = ++x; assert (t == 107); }
> + { int t = --x; assert (t == 107); }
> + { int t = x (); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x, I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x[I]; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x-=I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x/=I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = (x*=I); assert (t == 7); }
> +
> + { int t = x & I; assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x >> I; assert (t == 8); }
> + { int t = &x; assert (t == 8); }
> +}
> +
> +template <typename T>
> +void
> +Foo4 (T)
> +{
> + Y x;
> + { int t = operator+ (x, I); assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = operator- (x, I); assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = operator* (x, I); assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = operator/ (x, I); assert (t == 6); }
> + { int t = operator+= (x, I); assert (t == 6); }
> +
> + { int t = x.operator% (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator<< (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator| (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator&& (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator|| (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator== (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator!= (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator< (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator<= (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator> (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator>= (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator* (); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator! (); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator~ (); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator++ (0); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator-- (0); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator++ (); assert (t == 107); }
> + { int t = x.operator-- (); assert (t == 107); }
> + { int t = x.operator() (); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator, (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator[] (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator-= (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator/= (I); assert (t == 7); }
> + { int t = x.operator*= (I); assert (t == 7); }
> +
> + { int t = x.operator>> (I); assert (t == 8); }
> + { int t = x.operator& (); assert (t == 8); }
> + { int t = x.operator& (I); assert (t == 8); }
> +}
> +
> +
> +/* These definitions should be irrelevant to operator lookup of non-dependent
> + expressions inside the above templates since they are not in scope at
> + template-definition time (but are in scope at instantiation time). */
> +inline int operator+(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator-(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator*(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator/(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator%(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator>>(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator<<(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator&(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator|(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator^(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator&&(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator||(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator==(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator!=(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator<(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator<=(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator>(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator>=(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator*(const Y&) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator!(const Y&) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator~(const Y&) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator++(const Y&) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator--(const Y&) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator++(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator--(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator,(const Y&, int) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator&(const Y&) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator+=(const Y&, int x) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator*=(const Y&, int x) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator-=(const Y&, int x) { return 11; }
> +inline int operator/=(const Y&, int x) { return 11; }
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> + Foo1 (0);
> + Foo2 (0);
> + Foo3 (0);
> + Foo4 (0);
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/two-stage4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/two-stage4.C
> index 7d97109..a89e618 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/two-stage4.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/two-stage4.C
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ template<typename T> bool operator==(wrap<T>, wrap<T>);
> template<typename T>
> void g(T, wrap<wrap<int> > x)
> {
> - bool b = x == x; // { dg-bogus "" "" { xfail *-*-* } }
> + bool b = x == x; // { dg-bogus "" "" }
> }
>
> template<typename T> void operator==(wrap<wrap<T> >, wrap<wrap<T> >);
> --
> 2.6.4.491.gda30757.dirty
>