This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix ICE with -fno-if-conversion (PR rtl-optimization/68730)


On December 10, 2015 9:11:16 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>It seems some passes in between the combiner and ira aren't prepared to
>update dominance info.  It usually is not a problem, because already
>before
>the combiner we call free_dominance_info.  But we now have a new i?86
>stv pass that is injected after the combiner that computes dominators
>but
>does not free them.
>
>So, to fix ICE on the following testcase, we can either do what the
>patch
>does, or could conditionalize both the calculate_dominance_info and
>free_dominance_info in the convert_scalars_to_vector function (stv
>pass)
>on the dominance info not being computed (like other places in gcc do),
>or we could stick free_dominance_info into all passes that break the
>dominators just in case it would be computed (out_of_cfglayout is one
>example).

We rely on this everywhere else so that would be preferred.

Richard.

>
>Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, is this ok for
>trunk
>(or some other variant is preferrable)?
>
>2015-12-10  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>	PR rtl-optimization/68730
>	* config/i386/i386.c (convert_scalars_to_vector): Call
>	free_dominance_info at the end.
>
>	* gcc.dg/pr68730.c: New test.
>
>--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj	2015-12-09 14:39:02.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c	2015-12-10 12:15:59.517609392 +0100
>@@ -3577,6 +3577,7 @@ convert_scalars_to_vector ()
>   BITMAP_FREE (candidates);
>   bitmap_obstack_release (NULL);
>   df_process_deferred_rescans ();
>+  free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
> 
>   /* Conversion means we may have 128bit register spills/fills
>      which require aligned stack.  */
>--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68730.c.jj	2015-12-10 12:22:07.330365019
>+0100
>+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68730.c	2015-12-10 12:24:03.908702426 +0100
>@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>+/* PR rtl-optimization/68730 */
>+/* { dg-do compile } */
>+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fno-if-conversion" } */
>+/* { dg-additional-options "-march=x86-64" { target { i?86-*-*
>x86_64-*-* } } } */
>+
>+int b, d, e;
>+unsigned long long c = 4100543410106915;
>+
>+void
>+foo (void)
>+{
>+  short f, g = 4 % c;
>+  int h = c;
>+  if (h)
>+    {
>+      int i = ~c;
>+      if (~c)
>+	i = 25662;
>+      f = g = i;
>+      h = c - g + ~-f;
>+      c = ~(c * h - f);
>+    }
>+  f = g;
>+  unsigned long long k = g || c;
>+  short l = c ^ g ^ k;
>+  if (g > 25662 || c == 74074520320 || !(g < 2))
>+    {
>+      k = c;
>+      l = g;
>+      c = ~((k && c) + ~l);
>+      f = ~(f * (c ^ k) | l);
>+      if (c > k)
>+	__builtin_printf ("%d\n", f);
>+    }
>+  short m = -f;
>+  unsigned long long n = c;
>+  c = m * f | n % c;
>+  if (n)
>+    __builtin_printf ("%d\n", f);
>+  while (f < -31807)
>+    ;
>+  c = ~(n | c) | f;
>+  if (n < c)
>+    __builtin_printf ("%lld\n", (long long) f);
>+  for (; d;)
>+    for (; e;)
>+      for (;;)
>+	;
>+  c = h;
>+  c = l % c;
>+}
>
>	Jakub



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]